DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 08
O01
9 January 2
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW, OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF FORMER
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her
record reflect the reentry code of RE-3G (Condition (not
physical disability) interfering with performance of duty) waice
RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of her DD
Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
issued on 25 March 2011.
2. The Board, consisting of Nigg +2 SON ai OD .
gM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 8 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and
enclosures (1) through (3).
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 22 September 2010.
She was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed
mood and recommended for administrative separation. She
received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 25 March
2011, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for retention).
1S Se ees me SS
Under governing directives she could have received a code of
“RE-3G” or “RE-4."
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that it would be in the interest of justice to
remove the stigma associated with a reentry code of RE-4 in this
case.
Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an injustice
warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
she received a reentry code of “RE-3G” vice “RE-4".
b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in her
record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN AMES hike
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Re BS. Aa)
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1655 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Ms. Polk, and Mr. Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 2 September 2004, she was assigned an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 reentry code. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE Recorder Acting Recorder S. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03492-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 3492-11 30 January 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ia OF NAVAL RECORD OF ess Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01820-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1820-11 96 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD ae Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 18 April 1995. Pfeiffer, Ivins, and Blanchard, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08071-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8071-08 23 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qe 206 REE. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 19 February 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 17 March 2008, she was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00139-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 139-08 19 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of |the Navy Subj: FORMER sgeeul REVIEW OF NA AL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 lU.s.c. Pursuant to the Provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry |code she was assigned on 31 May 2006. That Petitioner’s naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00347-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she received a more favorable reentry code than RE-4.2. The Board, consistingofMessr5.~U~,~~an - reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03188-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 7 October 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. i, oi and —y, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9270 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3G (condition, not disability) vice RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 7 December 1999. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05010-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Gattis, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although Petitioner was properly...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0533 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into military service (other)) and the RE-4 reentry code issued on 17 February 2009, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Lapinski, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice © on 12 March 2014, and, pursuant to its...